Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

What project benefits really mean for the project manager

I had a long and protracted email ‘conversation’ with a project manager based in Europe. He was adamant that the prime reason that anyone ran with a project was to deliver benefits. Our email ‘conversation’ went on for some time and we both agreed that there was not enough emphasis put on benefits management and benefits realisation in projects. 

Our emails covered many aspects including what benefits realisation means to the project manager. We finally agreed that at its simplest, it means ensuring project benefits are clearly identified and articulated and realised in projects. 

So, what does this all mean for the project manager? 

  1. Establishing clear project benefits early in the life of the project: these need to be clear and realistic and need to take account of “delusional optimism.” This is over-emphasising projects’ potential benefits and underestimating likely costs, spinning success scenarios while ignoring the likelihood of possible mistakes. (See Defeating ‘Benefits Fraud - Stephen Jenner
  2. Asking questions: easy questions, difficult questions and dumb question of your stakeholders. The project manager needs to tease out the real business benefits. and to do this you need answers to questions; answers your stakeholders will often find difficult to answer. On our project management training courses we talk a lot about developing questioning skills and you may find this  helpful   
  3. Developing clear measurement criteria: too often I hear project managers talking about project benefits they have identified. When challenged there are no measurement criteria against them and no process in place to check that the benefits have been achieved post project. Do remember ‘delusional optimism ‘in point 1 above 
  4. Marketing the benefits: we have had many comments from people on our project management courses  that say something like “we cannot get finance on board” or “HR do not want to buy into this project”. If the benefits were packaged and sold to them effectively then maybe, just maybe they would come on board or buy into the project  
  5. Ensuring benefit management is integrated into your project: is the focus on delivering the project or the project benefits? You may argue they are the same however we have seen people drive delivery without the inclusion of project benefits! Project management benefits are integral to project management, not an ‘add on’ 
  6. Recognising that benefit realisation can be a staged process: if the project is to say save money or improve quality then the project to deliver these may have ended before the savings or the quality improvement are realised. An analysis of project benefits may need to be picked up some months after project closure, maybe it is a project in its own right 
  7. Making recommendations; project managers often complain of not enough resources (time, money, and people). There is pressure to deliver more with less however sometimes the project manager must be able to suggest or recommend to their sponsor that certain projects take priority over others. Rather Why not use clearly identified and measured benefits to help you do this. Compare and contrast one set of benefits against another. Of course, the priority decisions need to be made by classifying project benefits it can help

 There is a clear trend for more emphasis on benefits management. This will mean project managers developing realistic benefits that add real value to projects. Project managers will need to sell benefits to stakeholders including project sponsors and ensure effective monitoring takes place. Don’t forget, a benefit may take some time to be realised so you need to have a process that follows up; often some time later. 

IT suppliers - reduce your costs or your out!

The above headline seems to be the message in an article in the latest edition of Computer Weekly.: The article, called “How will suppliers be able to cut IT costs?” starts with the words: “The government has told IT suppliers it wants them to reduce the cost of contracts with government departments.” The paragraph ends with: “But it could be the government that has to change the most.”

Nineteen IT suppliers met the Cabinet Office Minister, Francis Maude to start the process of reducing the cost of contracts.

The article goes on to suggest that ‘red tape’ needs to be addressed and the government must overcome a lack of trust if suppliers are to meet targets without just cutting costs to the bone or stripping service levels.

“The government wants immediate reductions in costs and ongoing cuts” says the article.

Francis Maude said he was challenging major government suppliers to take costs out of contracts. “Some of this will come from margins, but we will invite ideas on how we can structure things differently to reduce complexity and cost.”

There will no doubt be more articles like this as time progresses and for sure, this will impact on many people - anyone involved in IT, project management or procurement plus of course shareholders.

If you are based in the US you also have some ‘issues.’ Shortly before completing this article I came across the headline: “White House to Review High Risk Projects”. This can be found here.

An extract of the Computer Weekly article can be found here.

It’s your job to protect project scope

Yes it is. Someone needs to do it, so why not you! Protect the project scope!

Well, there are some major assumptions that need testing in the above words:

  1. someone needs to do it; I am still coming across projects where the scope of the project is identified, agreed but not managed. So, whether you are a project sponsor, project board member, project manager or team member. Take responsibility and protect what has been agreed.
  2. protect the project scope; why bother? I have assumed of course that the scope of work has been agreed. If this is the case then the scope needs protecting. I see too many projects where scope creep seems endemic. (Scope creep, amending the scope of work to be done without an agreed process to check that the ‘new work’ is worth doing)

A lack of protection around the scope is a clear risk. It is also a governance one - who can make the decisions to change the project and how.

So, here is a simple process to help you manage scope creep or requests for change. It is by no means perfect and you will need to put your head above the parapet by suggesting completing of a change request form. Download a brief PowerPoint presentation here and some hard copy documents.

“Scope creep is a sick illness treatable only by saying no.” This quote came from a project manager who decided to challenge the ‘request’ from a senior manager to include something in the project. I suggested he should avoid saying NO but use the process. He did and focused on the process in the presentation and it worked!

Get the presentation here and some free templates!

Reduce optimistic planning bias in your projects

So, according to all the news reports, the previous Labour government here in the UK got it wrong! They forecast that economic growth would be 3.25%. The new Office for Budget Responsibility has downgraded this estimate to 2.6%.

News reports suggest that the previous Labour Government were overoptimistic in their planning estimates.

Cut now to projects. I hear all the time that senior managers demand delivery of a project by a certain date. But, the issue for those involved is that the date is usually widely optimistic.

So, what can be done? During a recent project management training course we discussed this in some detail and came up with a number of possible options.

• plan the project and then present this to your senior manager showing the problems of delivery
• use the quality, time cost triangle to show the impact of delivery to the date required with the resources (people and money) available
• show the plan without risks and then with risks highlighting the impact of trying to deliver the project by the due date
• reduce quality of the overall project saving valuable time (clearly not an option for some, a possibility for others)
• the tongue in cheek suggestion of asking for more resources and showing the impact of no resources on the project

Of course, these suggestions are based on the people involved, the project and the company!! However, I also suggested that project managers sometimes need to raise their heads above the parapet. In other words, challenge the demand to deliver when it is clear that you cannot. I did however preface this comment that project managers, like all managers need to develop their influencing skills. This is just the opportunity.

So, what suggestions do you have for dealing with the demand for delivery by a date that is overoptimistic? I would be interested to hear!

I need to be able to control my project

For just over 3 weeks I have been trying to sort out a real mess with my Broadband supplier BT. This has cost me lost time, lots and lots of emotional stress and strain and guess what, we are into week 3 and the problem has only just been sorted out.

I mentioned my frustrations to a group of people who attended one of our project workshops . I mentioned that I felt out of control as I could not seem to resolve the problem. The discussion developed and it was interesting when I asked how many of the group felt they were in control in all of their projects. Few said yes.

I have often felt that some course participants who come along to our project management workshops need more control and I have expressed this to different groups. This lack of control in projects is manifested in many different ways:

• having poor briefings about their projects from their sponsors - often not having the background to understand why they are doing the project including some of the ‘political’ background.

• project resources being pulled from the project despite the resource being involved in the allocation of time and the responsibility

• poor guidance on project priorities - project managers often report that priorities are unclear or seem to change very quickly leaving the project manager to dance a different tune

• poor internal processes ranging from extended decision making to poor or no project management methodologies

• poor project accountabilities leaving the project manager unsure as to who can and cannot make a decision

I know many of you reading this article will suggest that project managers need to be resilient, develop strategies to regain control etc. There are however many project managers who are struggling to regain control of their projects. Our project management training helps but does not give them back the control they need to deliver.

Always remember, you cannot hold a person responsible for what they do not control!