<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ron Rosenhead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk</link>
	<description>CEO of Project Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:29:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are simply too many projects in companies today! by Ron Rosenhead</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/393/there-are-simply-too-many-projects-in-companies-today/#comment-5658</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=393#comment-5658</guid>
		<description>Ah Jim, a new definition of projects..now there is a thing! 

I have just sent an outline for a course for project sponsors to a client. I have started with what I called the &#039;project listing exercise&#039;. I added a few words which reads as follows:

&quot;This activity usually surprises a few people with the amount of projects underway and “I didn’t know we were doing that project”

Another form of words I could have added was - but we have just finished a similar project. All of the elements mentioned in the article still stand for me despite it being written some 17 months ago. I would add the issue of capability. Training budgets are being scaled back and this may well mean that people are drafted in to run or engage with projects who are not trained.

Appreciate the comments Jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah Jim, a new definition of projects..now there is a thing! </p>
<p>I have just sent an outline for a course for project sponsors to a client. I have started with what I called the &#8216;project listing exercise&#8217;. I added a few words which reads as follows:</p>
<p>&#8220;This activity usually surprises a few people with the amount of projects underway and “I didn’t know we were doing that project”</p>
<p>Another form of words I could have added was &#8211; but we have just finished a similar project. All of the elements mentioned in the article still stand for me despite it being written some 17 months ago. I would add the issue of capability. Training budgets are being scaled back and this may well mean that people are drafted in to run or engage with projects who are not trained.</p>
<p>Appreciate the comments Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are simply too many projects in companies today! by jim sloane</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/393/there-are-simply-too-many-projects-in-companies-today/#comment-5656</link>
		<dc:creator>jim sloane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=393#comment-5656</guid>
		<description>I agree! Way too many projects at one time. I remember seeing a graphic of efficiency loss as projects go over TWO per PM! This ratio is almost unheard of among the PMs I know here in silicon Valley. MOst PMs would feel lucky, or worry that they are not perceived as a &#039;major&#039; contributor!
But then I talked with one city government group who called a printer malfunction and its resolution, a &#039;project&#039;.
MAybe that&#039;s the key, lets change the definition of projects!
Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree! Way too many projects at one time. I remember seeing a graphic of efficiency loss as projects go over TWO per PM! This ratio is almost unheard of among the PMs I know here in silicon Valley. MOst PMs would feel lucky, or worry that they are not perceived as a &#8216;major&#8217; contributor!<br />
But then I talked with one city government group who called a printer malfunction and its resolution, a &#8216;project&#8217;.<br />
MAybe that&#8217;s the key, lets change the definition of projects!<br />
Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are no risks in this project! by Ron Rosenhead</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/827/there-are-no-risks-in-this-project/#comment-5554</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=827#comment-5554</guid>
		<description>This is a good point Sigrid. No surprises is pretty acceptable and used a lot. Will try and use this in future. Thanks

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point Sigrid. No surprises is pretty acceptable and used a lot. Will try and use this in future. Thanks</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? by Ron Rosenhead</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/3648/who-%e2%80%98owns%e2%80%99-project-management-in-your-company/#comment-5553</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=3648#comment-5553</guid>
		<description>But is it and should it be the PMO? 

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is it and should it be the PMO? </p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? by PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/3648/who-%e2%80%98owns%e2%80%99-project-management-in-your-company/#comment-5551</link>
		<dc:creator>PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=3648#comment-5551</guid>
		<description>I guess it&#039;s the PMO...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s the PMO&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? by Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? &#171; PMChat</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/3648/who-%e2%80%98owns%e2%80%99-project-management-in-your-company/#comment-5549</link>
		<dc:creator>Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? &#171; PMChat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=3648#comment-5549</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue reading here: Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue reading here: Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How effective are your Project Boards by Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? &#124; Project Management Training with Ron Rosenhead</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/3631/how-effective-are-your-project-boards/#comment-5548</link>
		<dc:creator>Who ‘owns’ project management in your company? &#124; Project Management Training with Ron Rosenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=3631#comment-5548</guid>
		<description>[...] How effective are your Project Boards [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How effective are your Project Boards [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where’s the project handover plan by Ron Rosenhead</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/272/wheres-the-project-handover-plan/#comment-5539</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=272#comment-5539</guid>
		<description>[...] Where’s the project handover plan? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where’s the project handover plan? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are no risks in this project! by Sigrid Hauer</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/827/there-are-no-risks-in-this-project/#comment-5536</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigrid Hauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=827#comment-5536</guid>
		<description>Very good - just my experience with stakeholders and some sort of project managers: &quot;If I close my eyes, it just disappears...&quot;.
I found out, that talking about &quot;surprises&quot; instead of risks in projects sometimes helps. People react on certain &quot;key words&quot;. Avoiding the dangerours word &quot;risk&quot; can help to get them into a discussion about what might happen to their project, if they don`t pay attention ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good &#8211; just my experience with stakeholders and some sort of project managers: &#8220;If I close my eyes, it just disappears&#8230;&#8221;.<br />
I found out, that talking about &#8220;surprises&#8221; instead of risks in projects sometimes helps. People react on certain &#8220;key words&#8221;. Avoiding the dangerours word &#8220;risk&#8221; can help to get them into a discussion about what might happen to their project, if they don`t pay attention &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How effective are your Project Boards by How effective are your Project Boards &#171; PMChat</title>
		<link>http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/3631/how-effective-are-your-project-boards/#comment-5486</link>
		<dc:creator>How effective are your Project Boards &#171; PMChat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronrosenhead.co.uk/?p=3631#comment-5486</guid>
		<description>[...] View article: How effective are your Project Boards [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View article: How effective are your Project Boards [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

