At a meeting of the International Project Management Convocation (IProMco) this month, the Board ruled there was no need for projects to have a project sponsor.
The Board suggested that as the role was not being played out fully by project sponsors then it was ‘unnecessary.’ In addition, the amount of project sponsorship training has fallen dramatically over the last 24 months. There were some heated debates and on a day when temperatures outside were a hot 40 degrees Celsius inside temperatures really rose as did tempers. The hosting delegation from Australia nearly walked out. They were however stopped when the Chair cited an obscure ruling.
The conclusion from the Board and ratified by the Senior Executive Committee was that because sponsors failed to carry out their role effectively and training was falling it should cease to be an ‘official’ position in project management. The formal date for this to take place is 1 June, 2018.
The Board of IProMco said that there are some great advantages for project managers:
- They will no longer need the sponsor to approve the business case and charter. This will save a lot of time in long badly run meetings a lot of meetings involving sponsors and stakeholders
- Linked to the above the project manager will now provide direction and guidance for strategies and initiatives linked into the overall strategic agenda
- The project manager will be able to make really important decisions. They have had the training especially around strategy and organisational politics so this is great. There will be no more waiting for sponsors to make a decision
- The project manager will deal directly with all key stakeholders. No matter how senior and how committed they are to the project the project manager will now oversee this aspect. All the engagement, selling and getting buy in (especially where there are boundary management issues) will be down to the project manager
It will enable the project manager to make go/no go decisions. The sponsor only gets in the way so the project manager can easily cover this off!
They can take real risks – sponsorship reduces risk taking and stifles innovation!
IProMco suggest that there will be Time saving: this is as a result of the project manager being in two positions delivering the project alongside monitoring the project
The results of IProMco decision will take a while however it will be far reaching in its consequences.
I have one major question: who has done a benefits management study on this decision?
Image: Original image from Google Images amended labelled for use with modification